
An ominous scene was set with very few people near our location on the beach, a military vehicle a few hundred yards in the distance and an ATV was making its way toward us. The ATV continued past us without acknowledgment and we continued toward the shore. We found ourselves separated from the water by a three-foot wall of sand and orange boom, which both ran the length of the beach in either direction. On the far side of the boom, piles of sand mixed with balls of tar and oil soaked debris had been
Returning to the car, we continued down Route 1 to the end of Grand Isle and paid the $1 fee to enter the Grand Isle State Park. While driving entrances to the beach were closed, we were able to walk down a wooden walkway towards a structure, which overlooks the beach. This is where workers were currently collecting tar balls and oil soaked trash into plastic bags. Sand sifting machines parked to their left and oilrigs in the distance, these were the individuals tasked with returning the beach of Grand Isle to its former greatness for BP to publicize in the future. The workers didn’t stop others from walking around the beach, but wouldn’t allow anyone to cross the boom nor would they talk with anyone asking questions.

BP has received criticism overtime about blocking the press’s ability to report what is happening on the ground in places like Grand Isle and across the southern states where the oil has hit land. Given the anger of local residence, the visual impact of oil stained beaches, and the desire for information, what benefit does BP find in preventing the press from covering portions of this crisis? How far can BP work towards message control before they are interpreted as obstructionist or deceptive? How has the communication from BP about the Deepwater Horizon crisis differed from the communication from Pemex during the Ixtoc I crisis? What lessons were learned and what lessons remain to be learned?
No comments:
Post a Comment